A side event at the IAEA 67th General Conference "Providing the best nuclear data for tomorrow's nuclear solutions; Challenges and opportunities"; For "visualization" of nuclear data usage

Fukahori, Tokio

Kaku Deta Nyusu (Internet), (137), p.1 - 10, 2024/02

http://www.aesj.or.jp/~ndd/ndnews/pdf137/No137-01.pdf

At the request of the EC/Joint Research Center, the author attended on an EU-sponsored side event "Providing the best nuclear data for tomorrow's nuclear solutions: challenges and opportunities" held simultaneously at the IAEA 67th General Conference as a panelist. Presented were the prospects for nuclear data activities in Japan and discussed the sustainability and revitalization of nuclear data activities. In addition, based on the roundtable discussion at this side event, the Nuclear Data Section held a meeting consisting mainly of panelists to consider future responses. In this article, I would like to report on the side event and subsequent follow-up meetings and discuss the background of these meetings.

Historical overview of nuclear data evaluation in intermediate energy region

Fukahori, Tokio

AIP Conference Proceedings 769, p.47 - 52, 2005/05

https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1944955

In recent years, intermediate energy nuclear data are required for various applications such as accelerator-driven systems for waste transmutation, spallation neutron sources, advanced cancer therapies, estimation of single event up set rate and dose on astronauts. For these requirements, many groups in the world continue intermediate energy nuclear data evaluation. The early stage of this evaluation was initiated in USA. For example, Pearlstein at Brookhaven National Laboratory produced systematics, modified ALICE code and evaluated proton and neutron nuclear data in late 1980s. At Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, similar data developed for a medical application. Following them, many countries, such as Europe, Japan, Russia, China, Korea, started the preparation of nuclear data in this energy region. Overview of evaluation methods, results of evaluations are presented in comparison between experimental data and evaluated files, mainly JENDL High Energy File, as well as results from benchmark calculations.

Proceedings of the 3rd Specialists' Meeting on High Energy Nuclear Data, March 30 - 31, 1998, JAERI, Tokai, Japan

Fukahori, Tokio

JAERI-Conf 98-016, 138 Pages, 1998/11

JAERI-Conf-98-016.pdf:6.65MB

no abstracts in English

Proceedings of the Second Specialists' Meeting on High Energy Nuclear Data; January 2627, 1995, JAERI, Tokai, Japan

Fukahori, Tokio; *

JAERI-Conf 95-016, 150 Pages, 1995/07

JAERI-Conf-95-016.pdf:4.56MB

no abstracts in English

Reactor physics activities in Japan; July, 1992 July, 1993

Research Committee on Reactor Physics

JAERI-M 93-254, 36 Pages, 1994/01

JAERI-M-93-254.pdf:1.27MB

no abstracts in English

Comparison of double-differential neutron emission cross sections calculated from evaluated nuclear data libraries with experimental data

Fukahori, Tokio; Chiba, Satoshi; Asami, Tetsuo*

JAERI-M 92-053, 205 Pages, 1992/04

JAERI-M-92-053.pdf:3.36MB

no abstracts in English

Conceptual Design Nuclear Power Plant Database System

*; ;

JAERI-M 84-051, 40 Pages, 1984/03

JAERI-M-84-051.pdf:1.09MB

no abstracts in English

60th Anniversary of Investigation Committee for Nuclear Data; All Japan endeavor for nuclear data activities, 1; 60 years of Investigation Committee for Nuclear Data

Fukahori, Tokio

no journal, , 

Initially, the Sigma Committee consisted of two sides of the same coin: the Atomic Energy Society of Japan (AESJ) Sigma Special Committee and the Japan Atomic Energy Research Institute (JAERI) Sigma Research Committee. It is original the Sigma Committee conducts actual work such as research, evaluation and evaluation of nuclear data (including measurement, called "nuclear data activity") rather than a "place for examination" that can be felt from the sense of the word "committee". At present, the AESJ's Investigation Committee of Nuclear Data and the JAEA's JENDL Committee are working independently, and the JENDL Committee has taken over the actual work of producing nuclear data files. On the occasion of the 60th anniversary of the Sigma Committee, we have reviewed its progress and historical description so far given in the references.